or authorities. this will often be the quickest and most effective way to resolve the issue. available means of redress at national level as stated in the treaties, public authorities and national courts have the main responsibility for the application of union law. therefore, it is in your interest to make use of all possible means of redress at national level (administrative and/or out-of-court mediation mechanisms). depending on the system of each country, you may also submit your file to the national ombudsmen or regional ombudsmen. or you can bring your matter to the court of the country where the problem occurred. find out more about national judicial systems or going to court. if solving your problemapplication of union law. you may submit your petition by post or online if you consider that the european commission has not dealt with your request properly, you may contact the european ombudsman (articles 24 and 228 tfeu). how to submit a complaint to the european commission you must submit your complaint via the standard complaint form, which you canfill out icompensation, complainants must still take their case to a national court within the time limit set out in national law. multiple complaints where a number of complaints are lodged in relation to the same grievance, the commission may register them under the same number. individual acknowledgements and letters may be replaced by a notice on the europa website.-level authorities alone or in partnership with ngos, and targeted large residential institutions for persons with disabilities with more than 120 residents. the call was closed on 20 april 2018, with the total funding contracted amounting to eur 16 million.human rights abuses taking place. they will be forced to spend their days in day care centres and meaningless activity, without any opportunity to live independently and to be included in community. thus, the approved projects are in breach of romania?s and the european union?s obligations under the united nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilitiessegregation and social exclusion of persons with disabilities in romania. &q8q&v,’7,&’-&+,”&included in the community, with choices equal to others. states must ensure that persons with disabilities can ?choose their place of residence and where and with whom they live? and that they are ?not obliged to live in a particular living arrangement?. this requires ?access to a range or in-home, residential and other community support services, including personal assistance necessary to support one complex with 8 residents, comprising one housing unit and one day-care centre. notably, the residential complex in tg. ocna, comprising 4 housing units for 24 people and one day-care centre, will be built on a perimeter that already holds other residential facilities (ie: the centre for care and assistance for persons with disabilities ?costache negri?). isolation and segregation from independent life within the community: the planneddevelopments are located in small villages (13) or in small towns (5), in what are some of the poorest and economically deprived regions in the european union. these small villages and towns typically lack any employment opportunities other than low-paid and insecure agricultural labour. there are little or no social opportunities, while public transport to larger settlements is scarce and pricey. it is not clear what the basis for choosing these settlements was, other than administrative convenience. at the stage of project selection, the tendering procedure did not require a scoping exercise to look at opportunities available in the community from an independent living perspective. the tenders inclubeneficiaries will spend their whole time in highly regimented activities between the sheltered housing and the day-care centres, with little or no access to the outside world. there is relatively little research on existing sheltered housing in romania, although clearly this notion tends to encompass very different realities as discussed abovit can be concluded that this call for tenders is not directed at the elimination of large institutions and institutional culture, but rather at the maintenance of the system that fails to provide individualised support and uses the ?one size fits all? approach. the call/&1-&’+5&&!&=2.’)’-+%1+’g”&&&&&&&
